
 |
CAP issues advice on marketing tweets following the Publishers Clearing House decision
|
Date: 22.01.2013
|

The Advertising Standards Authority has been grappling on a regular
basis with the difficult issue of public recognition of marketing
tweets. The Committee of Advertising Practice last week issued further advice on
the subject following the ASA’s finding that a tweet by celebrity Keith
Chegwin promoting a Publishers Clearing House competition wasn’t
obviously identifiable as a marketing communication.
The ASA’s latest adjudication concerned a tweet posted by Keith Chegwin which read: “ Just a quickie: Log on to pchprizes.co.uk 4 Your chance 2 win £100k plus Win £2,500 a week 4 life. Have a go X”.
The complaint against PCH was upheld even though the tweet
was composed by Chegwin not PCH and linked to PCH’s website which made
it clear that Chegwin was acting in a promotional capacity. The ASA
considered it was not clear from the tweet itself that KC had a
commercial relationship with PCH and therefore it would not be clear to
Twitter users that KC was tweeting on PCH’s behalf.
CAP, like the IAB and ISBA in their July 2012 guidance, recommends the use of the #ad hashtag to assist consumers in recognising Twitter marketing communications.
Marketers need to ensure that promotional activity conducted
by celebrities on their behalf complies with the CAP Code. Chegwin
evidently had “sole editorial control” over the offending tweet, but PCH
was still responsible for ensuring compliance. Marketers should review
the terms of their contracts with endorsers and ensure they are in a
position to exercise control over the endorser’s tweets and other
communications on their behalf.
Charles Swan
See also:
Tweeting significant conditions of promotions: how much information to include
Ofcom resolves ambiguity complaint over Channel 4 Prometheus interactive ad
ASA upholds complaint about Rooney and Wilshere marketing tweets for Nike e-bulletins are for general guidance only. Legal advice should be sought before taking action in relation to specific matters. Where reference is made to Court decisions facts referred to are those reported as found by the Court. Please note that past bulletins included in the Archive have not been updated by any subsequent changes in statute or case law.
<< back to ebulletins
|