
 |
Bulletins Story:
THE SUN LOSES VILLA WINDSOR VIDEO STILLS CASE
|
Date:
10.02.2000
|

The Court of Appeal this morning decided that the publication by
The Sun of video stills of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed could
not be justified on the grounds of fair dealing or public
interest.
The images were taken by security cameras at the Villa Windsor,
near Paris, which the couple visited on 30 August 1997 shortly
before their deaths. They were stolen by the head of security
at the villa and sold to The Sun.
Dodi Al Fayed’s father, Mohammed Al Fayed, claimed that the
couple were intending to marry and had spent three hours at the
villa considering it as a future home. In fact, the times
printed on the security images of the couple arriving and leaving
showed that their visit had only lasted for half an hour.
The High Court in March 1999 dismissed a copyright infringement
claim against The Sun, accepting its defences of fair dealing for
the purposes of reporting current events and public interest.
The Court of Appeal, finding against The Sun, held that the
motives of those involved and the fact that the stills had not been
published before, together with the fact that the head of security
had been paid £40,000 by The Sun, meant that the newspaper was not
entitled to rely on the defence of fair dealing. To describe
what The Sun did as fair dealing was “to give honour to
dishonour”.
The public interest defence was only available in limited
circumstances. The Sun’s argument that the stills needed to
be published in the public interest to expose the falsity of Mr Al
Fayed’s statements had no basis in law or logic.
Andrew Knights
February 2000
20
e-bulletins are for general guidance only. Legal advice should be sought before taking action in relation to specific matters. Where reference is made to Court decisions facts referred to are those reported as found by the Court. Please note that past bulletins included in the Archive have not been updated by any subsequent changes in statute or case law.
<< back to ebulletins
|